🔗 Share this article

Turns out he could survive losing against Grimsby. He weathered a decisive continental showpiece versus a particularly poor Tottenham teams for many years. He withstood losing at home to West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, his rigid approach, undermining some of the club’s most promising academy products, the 32% win rate, labeling his team the poorest the club has ever seen. But there was a single opponent against whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to tango. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, similar to numerous top-flight right-back in Blackburn’s title-winning campaign, Amorim came at the executive and appears to have missed. Even the most casual observer can see the paradoxical situation: a coach who frequently berated his squad for failing in individual battles crumbling in the face of the white heat and formidable presence of one of the Premier League’s most feared football executives.

And frankly, this whole bruising episode seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been easy, given his nine months in a similar role with the Saints, to view him as little more than a functionary within the club's structure: an individual who owed his position as much to his friendship with his former boss a fellow executive as any demonstrable skill. How mistaken everyone was. By masterfully outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate Dan Ashworth before him, Jason Wilcox has proved himself as one of the sport’s strategic masterminds: a strategic mind of which United’s competitors are now rightly wary.

A Strategic Conflict Over System and Philosophy

To illustrate, this was the director , after being involved in the leadership that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach in the first place, played a key role in attempting to convince Amorim to ditch his favored formation. Naturally, these pleas faced pushback. But perhaps these judgements hold greater authority when issued by a man with the unimpeachable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of three England caps and a contributor to a championship team decades past.

Perhaps in time he might agree to outline his thought processes to the rest of us. Maybe one day questions may arise regarding why the coach is walking away with full compensation, without any penalty clause activated. But Jason Wilcox seldom speaks publicly, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers in football – men like Jason Wilcox – simply operate at a level exceeding our prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, most likely we would perceive is a series of ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not equivalent to being prepared to comprehend it.

The Ultimate Authority In Command

Naturally, in training our focus on the sporting director we are obscuring the real power behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, after all, merely executing the directives of his superior the billionaire owner, who privately has made very clear his desire for a four-man defense. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also suggested deploying the forward in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for the club to embrace data science and analytics. Per reports, during a leadership summit soon after his minority ownership, he announced that the team's approach of play “shall be decided by this group”.

After all, Sir Jim is a specialist in this technical football matters, leveraging his previous experience in petrochemicals and yachting. Most importantly he is immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the rich are superior: more insightful, more wise, more tactically astute, simply superior. Who else could one trust to manage a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the building of a new stadium that looks similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

The New Football Order: Executives Above Coaches

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels of the game. For decades, teams mistakenly delegated big footballing decisions to subordinate staff such as coaches, scouts – players themselves. Maybe previously possible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with ideas and energy to go into a club and implement their plan through to completion. But how many companies have such individuals established? What number of mass redundancies have they managed? Far preferable to invest the real power where it belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with impressive professional resumes. It is wiser to decide the strategy in the boardroom and hire a coach who can tailor their offering accordingly. If coaches were formerly chefs, they have become more like delivery personnel: not really creating the product, yet finally accountable if it arrives poorly or leaks out to meet standards.

In the meantime, a coach's role is increasingly less about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the visible figurehead of an organisation they can do little to change. Enzo Maresca leads a team of literal children into Europe and wins domestic cups, and essentially is dismissed for talking. Wilfried Nancy finds his standing damaged while the people who hired him live to blunder indefinitely.

A Neoliberal Game: Accountability for the Coaches

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this represents corporate governance at work: the elevation of a privileged overclass who can never be wrong, whose decisions are always untouchable, whose mistakes can invariably be sacked away without explanation. Hire the system coach only to dismiss him for playing excessively 3-4-3. Hire the project manager and later bin them for requiring excessive time. And most importantly show gratitude; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for your new summer signings, for the reality that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.